How to Pick a Winner in Horse Racing: A Beginner’s Selection Process
Available in US
Luck vs Method: Why a Selection Process Beats Gut Feeling
For my first two years of betting on racing, I picked horses the way most people do: I liked the name, the jockey’s colours looked sharp, or a tipster on the radio sounded confident. My results were exactly what you would expect from that approach — random. Some wins, more losses, and no idea why either happened.
BHA research through Project Beacon identified an addressable audience of over 25 million potential racing fans in the UK, with 16.9 million having minimal or no contact with the sport. One of the key barriers is the perception that picking winners is purely luck — that the sport is too complex for a casual observer to make informed decisions. That perception is wrong. You do not need to be an expert. You need a repeatable process.
What follows is the four-step method I use before every bet. It takes five to ten minutes per race and filters the field from a confusing mass of numbers to a shortlist of two or three genuine contenders. No method guarantees winners, but this one replaces guesswork with reasoning.
Step 1: Check Recent Form Figures
Open the racecard. Next to each horse’s name, you will see a string of numbers and letters — the form figures. These are the horse’s most recent results, read from left to right with the most recent run on the right. A “1” means it won that race. A “2” means second. Numbers continue to ninth place, and a “0” means it finished tenth or worse. Letters indicate incidents: “F” for fell, “U” for unseated rider, “P” for pulled up.
What you are looking for first is consistency. A horse with form figures of 2-3-1-2 has been competitive in every recent start. It may not have won every time, but it has been in the mix. Compare that to a horse showing 0-0-7-0 — that horse has been nowhere near the leaders in four consecutive runs. Unless there is a clear change in circumstances (different ground, dropped in class, first-time blinkers), recent poor form tends to continue.
A slash in the form figures indicates a break between seasons. Form from the previous season is less reliable than form from the current campaign. A horse showing 1-1-1/0-0-5 was brilliant last season but has been disappointing since returning. Treat pre-break form with caution.
Do not dismiss horses with a single bad run in otherwise solid form. Every horse has off days. A figure like 1-2-1-8-2 suggests the “8” was an anomaly — maybe the ground did not suit, or it had a troubled passage. One blip in an otherwise strong sequence is forgivable. Three consecutive poor runs is a pattern.
Step 2: Match Going Preference and Course Form
A horse that wins on firm ground and runs on heavy ground today is fighting its conditions. This is not a subtle factor — it is often decisive. Most form guides display a horse’s record on different types of going. If today’s ground is soft and the horse has never placed on anything worse than good, that is a significant negative.
Course form adds another layer. Some horses run consistently well at specific tracks. A horse with a “C” on the racecard has won at today’s course before. A horse with “D” has won over today’s distance. “CD” means both. These markers matter because courses vary enormously — Epsom’s undulations, Chester’s tight bends, Ascot’s stiff uphill finish. A horse that excels at one course may struggle at another. Previous success at the venue tells you the horse handles the specific challenges of that track.
When both going and course form align positively — the horse handles today’s ground and has won here before — you have a runner whose conditions are favourable. When both are against, you have a horse fighting on two fronts regardless of its talent.
Step 3: Trainer and Jockey Statistics
Seven percent of UK adults bet on horse racing during the festival-heavy spring months, a figure that drops to four percent outside the peak season. That seasonal fluctuation mirrors trainer and jockey performance too — some connections peak at specific times of year or at specific courses.
A trainer’s recent strike rate tells you about their yard’s current form. If a trainer is running at a 25 percent win rate over the past fortnight, their horses are fit and well-prepared. If the same trainer has not saddled a winner in six weeks, something is off. This information is available on most racing websites and apps — it takes thirty seconds to check.
Jockey bookings carry information too. When a top jockey chooses to ride one horse over another from the same stable, that choice is rarely random. Jockeys have inside knowledge about how horses are working at home and which the trainer fancies most. If a leading rider has abandoned a previous mount to ride a less fancied stablemate, pay attention — the switch often signals genuine confidence.
The trainer-jockey combination is also worth noting. Certain partnerships produce strike rates well above either individual’s average. A trainer who wins 15 percent of all races might win 28 percent when using a specific jockey. That synergy reflects trust, understanding, and tactical alignment that translates into results.
Step 4: What Market Movements Tell You
Brant Dunshea, the BHA’s Chief Executive, has spoken about the sport embracing new thinking to attract future generations of fans. For bettors, one of the most valuable pieces of “new” information available is real-time market data — and reading it correctly can confirm or challenge your own analysis.
A horse that shortens significantly in the market — from 10/1 to 6/1 in the hour before the race, for example — is being backed by people who are putting real money behind their opinion. That support might come from connections who know the horse is in peak form, from professional punters who have identified value, or from a combination of both. A shortening price does not guarantee a winner, but it tells you that informed money considers this horse more likely to win than the market initially suggested.
Conversely, a horse that drifts — lengthening from 5/1 to 8/1 — is losing support. Money is moving elsewhere. Sometimes the drift is driven by negative information: a horse looked unsettled in the Parade Ring, the ground has changed, or there is a late jockey change. Sometimes it simply reflects the weight of money going to other runners. Either way, a drifting horse deserves a second look at your initial analysis.
The market is not infallible. It is a consensus of opinion, weighted by money. But as a final filter — after form, going, course suitability, and connections — market movements either reinforce your shortlist or raise a question mark. Both are useful.
For a complete walkthrough of the racecard data that feeds each step of this process, the racecard reading guide covers every symbol, number, and abbreviation.
How many form figures should I look at before placing a bet?
Focus on the last five or six runs. This gives you enough data to identify patterns without going so far back that the form becomes irrelevant due to changes in the horse’s fitness, maturity, or training regime. Pay most attention to the three most recent runs, and use earlier form as context — particularly where the going or class of race differed significantly.
Does a horse’s draw position matter in flat races?
Yes, especially at certain courses and distances. At Chester, for example, a low draw is a significant advantage over short distances because the track is tight and left-handed. At Goodwood over sprint distances, the draw can be decisive depending on the going. Most form guides and racing commentary will highlight when the draw is expected to be influential. Over longer distances, the draw matters less because the field has more time to find its position.
Written by the editors at First bet Horse Racing.
